A frightening and important warning to all parents! Another reason to be alert and aware!
There exists such a thing called the United Nations Child Rights Treaty. Sounds innocent enough (if you haven't caught on to the sinister agenda of the UN), but this treaty threatens the fabric of our inalienable rights- and,more specifically, the God-given rights of parents. The treaty itself has been ratified by every one of the participating United Nations members,excluding the United States and Somalia…until now.
In 1995, then United States President Bill Clinton sought to ratify the treaty, but, much like the Kyoto Protocol, the Senate squashed it, exclaiming its overreaching threat to American parents. Now, overly liberal president, overly liberal Congress- and the threat has manifested itself again. The Left claims they have 60 votes- albeit soft, to push through the ratification, but Parental Rights.org seeks to add a necessary Constitutional Amendment:
FOR THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION
SECTION 1
The liberty of parents to direct the upbringing and education of their children is a fundamental right.
SECTION 2
Neither the United States nor any state shall infringe upon this right without demonstrating that its governmental interest as applied to the person is of the highest order and not otherwise served.
SECTION 3
No treaty may be adopted nor shall any source of international law be employed to supersede, modify, interpret, or apply to the rights guaranteed by this article.
According to parentalrights.org, here are 5 things you must know about the UN's Child Rights Treaty:
- The UN Child Rights Treaty Would Override Virually All U.S. Law: Our Constitution provides that treaties become part of the "supreme law of the land," overriding all inconsistent state laws and state constitutions. Since virtually all American law on families and children is state law, this UN treaty would be the supreme over the law made by your elected officials about every legal issue for your child.
- A UN Tribunal Would Hold America "Accountable" for Compliance: A committee of 18 "experts" has two critical powers: 1. The Committee issues official interpretations of the treaty. 2. It issues official determinations concerning compliance. We have seen what American courts do in "interpreting" the Constitution. When the UN gets to "interpret" a treaty, the legal rules can change according to the whims of the Committee. Do you want 18 "experts" from Uganda, Ghana, Syria, Algeria, Slovakia, Hungary, Egypt, Thailand, Tunisia, Germany, South Korea, Italy, Paraguay, Chile, Lithuania, Mauritius, Peru, and Switzerland deciding the rules for American families?
- This UN Treaty Gives the Government the Power to Override Any Decision You Make About Your Child: Under U.S. law, no government may override the decision of parents until proving they have harmed the child (abuse, neglect). Under the UN treaty the government could simply substitute its judgment for that of any parent if the government believed that its decision was "best" for the child.
- This UN Treaty Controls Where Your Child Goes to School, What Your Child May be Taught (including religion), How You Discipline Your Child, Medical Decisions, and Much More.
- SR 519 Urges the rejection of this treaty, the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child. 22 Senators have signed SR 519, showing that they believe that American parents should be trusted and that American laws should be made by Americans. You can check their website to see if your elected officials have yet signed on. www.parentalrights.org
November 28th, 2010 at 10:56 pm
i think you better review US statutory law…….
December 8th, 2010 at 10:51 am
Okay. Would that be ALL US Statuatory Law, or just certain portions????
Please to explain…
December 22nd, 2010 at 11:40 am
Being obedient to laws:
Yes, as long as they don’t conflict with Gods commands or the supreme law of the land, the Constitution.
Acts 5:29 But Peter and the other apostles answered and said: “We ought to obey God rather than men.
“This Constitution and the laws of the United States which shall be made in pursuance thereof…shall be the supreme law of the land; and the judges in every State shall be bound thereby… The Senators and representatives and members of the State legislatures, and all executive and judicial officers of the United States and the several States, shall be bound thereby…” – Constitution for these united States, Article VI, §2, Cl. 1
“…a regulation which is inconsistent with the law is invalid…because a statute may not operate in derogation of the Constitution.” – Title 5, U.S.C., 301, 559, C1., 2
“The General rule is that an unconstitutional statute, though having the form and name of law is in reality no law, but is wholly void, and ineffective for any purpose; since unconstitutionality dates from the time of it’s enactment and not merely from the date of the decision so branding it. An unconstitutional law, in legal contemplation, is as inoperative as if it had never been passed. Such a statute leaves the question that it purports to settle just as it would be had the statute not been enacted.
Since an unconstitutional law is void, the general principles follow that it imposes no duties, confers no rights, creates no office, bestows no power or authority on anyone, affords no protection, and justifies no acts performed under it…..
A void act cannot be legally consistent with a valid one. An unconstitutional law cannot operate to supersede any existing valid law. Indeed, insofar as a statute runs counter to the fundamental law of the lend, it is superseded thereby.
No one Is bound to obey an unconstitutional law and no courts are bound to enforce it.” – 16 Am Jur 2d, Sec 177 late 2d, Sec 256
Below is a close account of this years census at my house:
So the Census lady returned today and this is what happened:
She asks, “Are you the person I need to speak with?” (This is after I told everyone in the house to give no information and answer no questions whatsoever if and when the Census takers showed up and that I would deal with them. She was here twice before and I wasn’t here once and unavailable the other time.)
Me: “Yes and the answer is X.” (X being the number of people that live here)
Her: “Well, I need to get some “other” information like names, etc.”
Me: I hand her the Census Response letter and say, “Everything you need to know is in this letter. According to the Constitution I’m only required to give the number of people that live here.”
Her: Well they told us bla, bla bla…… (They must be her socialist overlords???)
Me: “The Constitution states that every 10 years enumeration is to take place and I gave you the number of people that live here. Thats all I’m required to give.”
Her: “Is there anybody that can confirm the number of people that live here?”
Me: I call my wife to the door as I tell the Census lady, “Sure but they aren’t required to give their name either.” As she looks at me with a puzzled look…. My wife confirms the number.
Her: She looks around to the other doors in the building as to motion if anyone else in the building can confirm the number of people living in MY apartment as if my wifes word isn’t good enough and says, “I need to know if anyone else can confirm the number, you could say there are 50 people living here and we wouldn’t have any way to know…..”
Me: “I could ask you to fill out this questionaire here and you would be required by federal law to answer it.”, as I show her the PUBLIC SERVANT questionaire.
Her: “Well, I’d be happy to fill it out if you wanted me to.”
Me: “I don’t think you would as there are alot of personal questions on it.” And I once again tell her that the only information I’m required to give according to the Constitution are the number of people that live here.”
Her: She gives up after this and then proceeds to ask me information about whether or not anyone lives in Apt. # X and if I know anything about them.
Me: I explain to her that I’m not required to give information about my neighbors and that it’s none of my business who lives where or not.
Her: “Well I’ve been here X amount of times and nobody has answered the door. I need to know if it’s vacant or not.”
Me: “Like I said, it’s not my job to say who lives where and all you needed to get from me is the number of people that live in my house.” as I proceed to end the encounter.
Her: “Ok, well, etc, etc.”
There is no doubt in my mind that this woman will be asking other people in the building about everyone else in the building that hasn’t complied with this unconstitutional invasion of privacy they call the “Census” which is about enumeration, NOT personal information.
Welcome to Amerika……..
————————————
And whether or not the health care bill is repealed, I will not be forced to buy insurance by an unconstitutional socialist “law”.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/40642879/ns/politics-more_politics
December 22nd, 2010 at 11:42 am
We are to obey the law, but we are not living in a dictatorship under Ceasar like the apostles were….yet. The laws of Rome do not apply in the U.S.
As the Constitution itself states:
“This Constitution and the laws of the United States which shall be made in pursuance thereof…shall be the supreme law of the land”
and U.S. Code:
“a statute may not operate in derogation of the Constitution”
and finally American Jurisprudence:
“No one Is bound to obey an unconstitutional law and no courts are bound to enforce it.”
If we disobey an unconstitutional law we may have to pay for it with fines or even jail time but we will be right in Gods eyes.
December 22nd, 2010 at 11:49 am
This was posted on DC.
ACTUAL FOOTAGE Pastor Beaten Tased by Border Patrol DPS
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sZ9OANYxgEQ&feature=player_embedded
In regards to the video above, if anyone believes that the ever increasing tyranny shown is Constitutional, than may I suggest reading a quote from one of the founders.
“They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety”. – Benjamin Franklin
I seem to recall reading something about those who say, “peace and safety” in the scriptures…..
And just as Christians twist the scriptures, our government twists the Constitution to suit their ends.
Nevertheless, just as the scriptures don’t change to fit the morals or lack therof of modern society, neither does the constitution.
http://www.constitution.org/cons/const_quotes.htm
“The Constitution is a written instrument. As such, its meaning does not alter. That which it meant when it was adopted, it means now.”
A good short video by Paul Washer
Persecution or a Great Awakening
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C7UyZYpeReY&feature=player_embedded
Will we stand with God no matter what the cost or will we stand with the coming beast government?
Don’t interpret the scriptures as it is specifically forbidden by the scriptures themslves.
As Paul Washer once wisely commented to a young man at a college,
“Young man, I didn’t interpret the text, I read it.”
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M7zcDFyUN_I&feature=player_embedded
See :35 second mark on above video.