Mom4Truth

Writing for World Net Daily, Dr. Jerome Corsi states,

"A former science adviser to British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher says the real purpose of the United Nations Climate Change Conference in Copenhagen on Dec. 7-18 is to use global warming hype as a pretext to lay the foundation for a one-world government."

Corsi quotes Lord Christopher Monckton as telling a Minnesota Free Market Institute audience at Bethel University in St. Paul,

"Your president will sign it. Most of the Third World countries will sign it, because they think they’re going to get money out of it. Most of the left-wing regimes from the European Union will rubber stamp it. Virtually nobody won’t sign it."

Corsi quotes Monckton as also saying,

"I read that treaty and what it says is this: that a world government is going to be created. The word ‘government’ actually appears as the first of three purposes of the new entity." (Thatcher adviser: Copenhagen goal is 1-world government – WND)

Plus, here is a later Fox Business interview with Lord Monckton, in which he further expands his thoughts: http://tinyurl.com/foxbusiness-monckton

Did Lord Monckton exaggerate?

My research of the Climate Change document that Monckton references found the following: it is a 181-page working document that does not mention the words "ballot," "elected official," or "vote" anywhere in it. In my opinion, Lord Monckton did not exaggerate; if anything, he may have understated the situation. The document does indeed appear to be the institutional framework for an unelected supreme communist-style world government.

By signing this document, the United States (and other industrial nations) will forever take responsibility for the ills of backwards and third world countries. And, according to Lord Monckton, this would include China and India, along with the countries of Africa. Notice:

• Page 6, "PP.15 Further acknowledging that developed countries have a historical responsibility for their disproportionate contribution to the causes and consequences of climate change, reflecting their disproportionate historical use of a shared global carbon space since 1850 as well as their proposed continuing disproportional use of the remaining global carbon space . . . Warming of the climate system, as a consequence of human activity, is unequivocal."
• Page 38, "28. The adverse effects of climate change and response measures, due to the historical cumulative GHG emissions of developed countries, constitute an additional burden on all developing country Parties (particularly low-lying and other small island countries, countries with low-lying coastal, arid and semi-arid areas or areas liable to floods, drought and desertification, and developing countries with fragile mountainous ecosystems) in reducing poverty, developing strategies to address social vulnerabilities and attaining sustainable development and a threat to achieving the United Nations Millenium Development Goals." 
• Page 122, "17. (a) Compensate for damage to the LDC’s economy and also compensate for lost opportunities, resources, lives, land and dignity . . ."

  "(b) Africa, in the context of environmental justice, should be equitably compensated for environmental, social and economic losses . . ."

By signing and being party to this document, we are accepting legal financial responsibility to support non-developed countries FOREVER.

• Page 27, "(b) Particularly vulnerable populations, groups and communities, [or] All vulnerable groups whose adaptive capacity is low, [or] Groups requiring special protection . . ."
• Page 43, "41. (a) Assessed contributions of at least 0.7% of annual GDP of developed country Parties."

These funds will go directly to governments and "community organizations."

• Page 39, "33. [The financial burden] must be at least USD 67 billion (in the range of USD 70-140 billion) per year."

The commitments of the developed countries are "economy wide."

• Page 58, "7. (a) Mitigation commitments by all developed countries are legally binding economy wide and absolute quantified emission reduction commitments."

  "(b) Mitigation actions by developing countries are VOLUNTARY . . ." (Emphasis added.)

The system appears to be loaded to ensure that the world body overseeing this document is granted total control for the enforcement of the requirements of this document throughout all developed countries. Penalties for non-compliance by developed countries are scattered throughout the document.

It appears that what a U.S. President and Congress (Republican or Democratic) could not do through the constitutional legislative process, they are attempting to do through international treaty. Therefore, it is my studied opinion that Lord Monckton’s assessment that this upcoming Climate Change Convention in Copenhagen is a "pretext" for the establishment of one world government is "spot-on."

It does seem to be getting clearer and clearer that if the elected civil magistrates in Washington, D.C., do not quickly grow some backbone and develop some sagacity as to the direction these globalists are taking our country, resistance will be forced (in one way or another) upon the States and the People, because it is not possible for the policies and financial burden that are – and will be – levied upon the backs of the American people to be sustained without the surrender of independence, the abridgment of constitutional government, and the loss of liberty.

Stay tuned.- As Posted by Chuck Baldwin

WND- "A "hate crimes" bill opponents claim will be used to crack down on Christian speech, even the reading of the Bible, was signed into law today by President Obama.

The Senate approved the Matthew Shepard and James Byrd, Jr. Hate Crimes Prevention Act by a vote of 68-29 on Oct. 22 after Democrats strategically attached it to a "must-pass" $680 billion defense appropriations plan.

Most Republicans, although normally strong supporters of the U.S. military, opposed the bill because it hands out federal money to states and local governments in pursuit of "preventing" hate crimes. The bill creates federal protections and privileges for homosexuals and other alternative lifestyles but denies those protections to other groups of citizens.

Obama signed the 2010 National Defense Authorization Act at a White House ceremony today. Prior to signing the act into law, Obama spoke briefly of the hate crimes bill.

"After more than a decade, we’ve passed inclusive hate-crimes legislation to help protect our citizens from violence based on what they look like, who they love, how they pray or who they are," he said. "I promised Judy Shepard when she saw me in the Oval Office that this day would come, and I’m glad that she and her husband, Dennis, could join us for this event. I’m also honored to have the family of the late Sen. Ted Kennedy who fought so hard for this legislation. I just want you all to know how proud we are of the work that Ted did to help make this day possible."

American Family Association President Tim Wildmon warned that the new law "creates a kind of caste system in law enforcement, where the perverse thing is that people who engage in non-normative sexual behavior will have more legal protection than heterosexuals. This kind of inequality before the law is simply un-American."

Wildmon said the legislation creates possible situations where pastors may be arrested if their sermons on sexuality can be linked in even the remotest way to acts of violence.

"It threatens free speech and freedom of religion and is totally unacceptable," he said.

As WND reported, U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder admitted a homosexual activist who is attacked following a Christian minister’s sermon about homosexuality would be protected by the proposed federal law, but a minister attacked by a homosexual wouldn’t be.

Dick Luger (R-IN) DC Office: (202)224-4814

George Voinovich (R-OH) DC Office: (202)224-3353

Olympia Snowe (R-ME) DC Office: (202)224-5344

Susan Collins (R-ME) DC Office: (202)224-2523

I say we call and express our no-thank-you sentiments!

I received this as an email that included the original post. We had prior warning of Obama’s anti-Israel tendencies, particularly because of his tutelage under Khaldi- “Khalidi is a harsh critic of Israel, has made statements supportive of Palestinian terror and reportedly has worked on behalf of the Palestine Liberation Organization while it was involved in anti-Western terrorism and was labeled by the State Department as a terror group.” WND

And now, it seems, when given an opportunity to stand in support of Israel, Obama spits in the face of the very people who mourned, more than many of America’s own citizens, the 9-11 attacks and showed their solidarity and support of America during those bleak days by putting the American flag and the Israeli flag on the front of their major news sorce proclaiming their unity with America!

Gaza was not the victim! I repeat, Gaza was the offender! Hamas has fired thousands of Quassam rockets into Israeli towns with ZERO concern for her people, in fact, they are offering these acts of evil on an altar to Allah, and to kill an infidel- a Christian or a Jew, is as high as offering oneself up through martyrdom. They are AIMING for Jewish citizens.

Playing savior to the Islamic nation, this sympathy for Gaza ignores the years of assault enacted upon Israel. One has to wonder why he is comfortable taking in “refugees” from Israel’s response to her ongoing attacks, while seemingly ignoring the ongoing trauma Israel has undergone.

To quote Benjamin Netanyahu, “If the Arabs put down their weapons, there’d be no more violence. If the Jews put down their weapons, there’d be no more Israel.”

The problem, Obama, is not Israel! The answer is not Khalidi and his anti-West, anti-Israel eradication efforts! And the answer is certainly not spending millions of dollars  bringing Palestinian terror-monger immigrants to our backyards in the name of apologizing for our, necessary, War on Terror! Here’s the email…

“President Barack Obama has signed an executive order  
presidential determination allowing hundreds of thousands of  
Palestinians to resettle in the United States. Sure, what can go  
wrong when we allow hundreds of thousands of people who have  
been, as Mark Steyn memorably described, “marinated” in a “sick  
death cult,” who voted for Hamas, and 55% of whom support  
suicide bombings live here and at the American taxpayers’  
expense:

 By executive order, President Barack Obama has ordered the  
expenditure of $20.3 million in migration assistance to the  
Palestinian refugees and conflict victims in Gaza.

 The “presidential determination” which allows hundreds of  
thousands of Palestinians with ties to Hamas to resettle in the  
United States was signed on January 27 and appeared in the  
Federal Register on February 4.

 President Obama’s decision, according to the Register, was  
necessitated by “the urgent refugee and migration needs” of the  
“victims.”

 Few on Capitol Hill took note that the order provides a free  
ticket replete with housing and food allowances to individuals  
who have displayed their overwhelming support of the Islamic  
Resistance Movement (Hamas) in the parliamentary election of  
January 2006.Let’s review some of Barack Obama’s most recent  
actions since he was inaugurated a little more than two weeks  
ago:

 * His first call to any head of state as president was to Mahmoud  
Abbas, leader of Fatah party in the Palestinian territory.

 * His first one on one interview with any news organization was with  
Al Arabia television.

 * He ordered Guantanamo Bay closed and all military trials of  
detainees halted.

 * He ordered all overseas CIA interrogation centers closed.

 * He withdrew all charges against the masterminds behind the USS  
Cole and 9/11.
  *  Today we learn that he is allowing hundreds of thousands of  
Palestinian refuges to move to and live in the US at American  
taxpayer expense.

 Anyone else seeing a pattern here?”