23 Feb 2009 @ 4:52 PM 

pound-puppyDuring one of his addresses, President Obama jokingly referred to the “recovery” package by saying “It’s not going to be perfect,” and with a tongue-in-cheek grin said, “Afterall, it is coming out of Washington and through Congress.” A laughing crowd smirked and fell at his feet in his attempt to distance himself from something he knows the majority of Amerians DO NOT support. I have to say, I’m still amazed at the amount of Obama-worship going on in this nation and in this world!

It is important to know that while Pelosi did write the content of this bill, the Washington to which he refers and the Congress he jokes about is his Washington and a Congress full of his friends. Do not let him fool you that he is not connected to the reprehensible politics of Washington- he is the Godfather of all that’s wrong with that city at this point.

And what right does he have to say, “It’s not going to be perfect.” Do we, as Americans, not have a right to a perfect trillion dollar package. We have all bought an item of clothing, only to bring it home to find a hole in the stitching on the side. Do we just shrug our shoulders, realizing that, while we just spent $20 on the shirt, we must now suck it up? No! We take that receipt and head back to the store, expecting a refund or an exchange for a shirt without blemish.

So, if and when we see the imperfections to which Obama is referencing, can we insist on a refund? If that’s the case, then I for one would like a $350 billion dollar refund from the banks that we bailed out. They are far from unblemished and I am not a fan of paying for things that come broken.

How about a refund from Detroit? Our government is treating this failed market like an animal pound. These “animals” come broken and carrying baggage. And for a cerain amount of money, we can “buy” these broken, unwanted companies, retrain them, and expect a full, energetic life out of them. If only someone would have pity on their sad little faces, staring back at them from the bankruptcy glass.

I’m sorry, but it doesn’t work that way. The truth is that these “animals” are sitting in a cage for a reason. Perhaps they were poorly trained from the beginning, perhaps they crap in people’s paths, perhaps they don’t listen when someone is trying to get their attention, but no amount of money poured into these mangy mutts will change the reality that they just stink.

By the time elections roll back around, we will have only spent 40% of the money. That is just enough time to open people’s eyes to bring logic and reason back into leadership roles, and enough time to save the other 60% of our money. And while we will have stepped into the largest debt our country has ever aqcuired, the fat lady hasn’t yet sung. We have to start getting the word out about defeating these socialist idealogues in the name of preserving our fiscal responsibility.

SocialTwist Tell-a-Friend
 16 Feb 2009 @ 3:23 PM 

money

 
“The final price tag on the stimulus bill is either $787 billion or $9.7 trillion, depending on how one defines words like “final” and “stimulus” and whether you are getting your news from a liberal or conservative news source. If you want your news straight … well, so do I. (But then I’d know how large the stimulus bill actually is. )
 
The fact is that there are as many possible definitions as there are people to define them. President Obama redefined “earmark” so that it meant anything added after the fact, not pork tacked on from the beginning in order to buy congressional votes.
 
Thus, $50 million for the National Endowment for the Arts qualifies as emergency stimulus spending, not pork. The 4 BILLION (with a “b”) for ACORN isn’t really a political payoff. It’s necessary emergency spending to stave off economic “catastrophe.” Without ACORN, how could the economy survive?
 
It is easily the most massive fraud in history, and it is being perpetrated with barely a peep of public opposition. In the first place, nobody understands the amounts of money involved.
 
Even at $787 billion, what does that mean? A billion seconds ago, Jimmy Carter was president of the U.S. A billion minutes ago, Herod was king of Judea.
 
I’ve read all kinds of calculations regarding what the final price tag is to cost each individual American, but again, it depends on some sliding scale of definitions too esoteric for ordinary humans to understand.
 
Somewhere between $1,600 for every man woman and child on earth (on the low end of the scale) to pretty much whatever number one wants to create – using an equally esoteric sliding scale for decimal points.
 
Let’s just say that it’s more than breathtaking. (To pay for it, don’t be surprised to hear plans for breath-taxing.)
 
There has never been a spending plan this large in the history of man. To pull it off, all pretense at keeping previous international trade and currency agreements has been completely abandoned. The “Buy American” clause stands in naked violation of the North American Free Trade Agreement.
 
The printing of money to subsidize an economic downturn is a violation of a number of international currency agreements in force since Nixon removed U.S. currency from the gold standard.
 
The other day, Sen. Chuck Schumer defended a planned $1.2 trillion expenditure by the Federal Reserve by shrugging, “It’s not taxpayer money.” He didn’t mean to, but Schumer let slip the big secret that only Americans are ignorant of.
 
It isn’t taxpayer money; it’s pretend money. It doesn’t exist until it is printed.
 
The only reason the extra $1.2 trillion isn’t counterfeit is because the Fed is authorized to print it, but it will accomplish the same thing. Doubling the amount of currency in circulation has the effect of halving the purchasing weight of the currency already in circulation.
 
Gerald Celente summed it up well on Glenn Beck’s program the other day: “This isn’t Economics 101. It’s not even Economics for Dummies!”
 
According to the latest economic information, the stock market is down a whopping 2,000 points since Election Day. (It makes you wonder what investors know that the rest of us don’t.)
 
And the economic stimulus bill gives a tax cut that amounts, on average, to about $13 more per week in your after-tax paycheck, or about $2.60 per day. (Never mind. Now we all know.)
 
Almost a trillion dollars in new spending and tax cuts – for a wage benefit for the average worker of about $2.60 per day. Well, America voted for change. And America got it.
 
Almost enough change to pay for one coffee break.
 
Tax cuts that would have genuinely benefited the economy – like a tax break for buying a U.S. made car or a tax credit for buying a new home – were dropped.
 
Provisions that would spend tens of millions to help people quit smoking or $50 million for energy upgrades for the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs Cemeteries Division remain intact.
 
Also intact is $8 billion (with a “b”) for high-speed rail service from Los Angeles to Las Vegas. Nothing like investing $8 billion to bail out suffering casinos as an economic stimulus.
 
These numbers aren’t merely unsustainable; they are unimaginable. It is almost as if there were a deliberate decision undertaken to “fix” the economy by spending it out of existence, forcing the creation of a new economic system in its place and … hey, wait a minute!
 
Naw. Nobody is that diabolical. But still … “- Hal Lindsey
SocialTwist Tell-a-Friend
 13 Feb 2009 @ 10:30 PM 

red-tape

 

 

I have something to say about this “Fairness Doctrine”…crap. You first, Obama. Obama goes on this town-hallin’ mission to convince his kingdom of the need for this ridiculous, over-porked, socialist spending package, because, let’s be real, it’s more spending than stimulating, and proceeded to give us the Gorbachev special. Buy some bull-s***, get communism for free! And it didn’t seem that our “transparent” and ”open” president was concerned about presenting both sides so that one may come to his own conclusions, rather he weaved his usual web of manipulation and deceit. So, now come the benefits of this trillion dollar package, and realize, it is a packaged deal, we take white-out to many of our Constitutional Rights. One of which is the Freedom of Speech. The liberal crew is trying to shut-up perceived conservative analysis of news events. What you call conservative analysis, I call logic, something the left is harshly lacking. This is leftist “logic”- do what I say, not as I do. They want to silence those who keep a watchful eye on Washington, and seek to promote those media outlets that maintain their fairytale. We all know how biased media is- NBC, CNBC, ABC, CBS, and MSNBC, Washington Times, the LA Times, The New York Times- all puppeteered by Obama. I am reminded of Richard Gere’s media-manipulation scene in “Chicago”- “How can they hear the truth above the roar?” I highly doubt these media outlets will be censored with this “fairness doctrine”. 90% of our population still holds to traditional, conservative values, yet 10% of the population is determining our future. How is this happening if not for the spin of the liberal media? We on the right must be sure to watch our p’s and q’s, yet my family is inundated with sexualized and immoral TV shows, movies, and commercials. And I ask, what’s fair about that?  I thank God for people like Sean Hannity and Rush Limbaugh, Dennis Prager and Laura Ingraham, Ann Coulter and Mike Gallagher- they are facing a major assault right now from the leftist loons that now run our country, but I say, keep it up till they shut you up! Blog and stand on the corners with signs, whatever you have to do, but proudly stake your claim on the First Amendment!

SocialTwist Tell-a-Friend

 Last 50 Posts
 Back
Change Theme...
  • Users » 2
  • Posts/Pages » 75
  • Comments » 79
Change Theme...
  • VoidVoid « Default
  • LifeLife
  • EarthEarth
  • WindWind
  • WaterWater
  • FireFire
  • LightLight