24 Sep 2009 @ 6:10 PM 

I’m going to attempt a post on race relations. I say attempt because I hold contempt at the PC route this country has taken in regards to discussing racism in America. Rest assured it is alive and well. I think, unfortunately, the mouths of white people have been taped and closed from being able to talk about this very subject for fear of being labeled a "racist". The white population, and now the right-wing conservatives in this country, have effectively been silenced from discussing their political disdain for Barack Obama or any other politically active black figure, barred from any right to an opinion solely based on the claim of racism.

The conservative movement has been accused of racism since our Marxist President took office- our exception to him cannot possibly be because we vehemently disagree with his radical policies? Nor because we believe in the conservative principles that made this country great? No. And the left has found the perfect, indefensible way to silence us- claim it is racism! And the good white and/or conservative Americans have allowed themselves the gag order! Racism- the last, "great" argument for the ignorant elite, threatened by a right-wing power, unanticipated.

Equally as startling, however, is the way that the left has guilt-tripped some black Americans into accepting socialist policies or risk being labled a race-traitor. There is a brilliant, conservative, black political commentator (her name escapes me at the moment!), who is often times a contributer on Fox News, who wrote a wonderful article on this very subject. She convicted on the necessity of holding true, first, to our conservative values rather than our many unecessary allegiances, including race allegiance.

I realize this to be sensitive subject matter, but I have had it up to here with being called a racist because I believe in small government, low taxes, am staunchly pro-life, pro-Israel, pro-capitalism, pro-Jesus, and pro-America being the shining city on the hill. And I know many black Americans who feel the exact same way- in fact, I have been privledged enough to stand with them at tea parties and out on the corner on election day.

Not a one of us is motivated by race- we are motivated by righteous principles and a disdain for the liberal infection that is disolving our great country.

It’s time to remove the gag order and call this president what he really is- Hitler! And Hitler was white! Does that also make me racist against whites? Welcome to 30’s Germany- WAKE UP, AMERICA!

SocialTwist Tell-a-Friend
 10 Jun 2009 @ 7:07 PM 

holocaustshootingThere was another shooting today. This one at the Holocaust Memorial Museum in DC. A man walked through the front entrance, lifted his rifle, and proceeded to open fire. Thankfully, as 1,000 people hit the floor, he was stopped in his tracks by an armed security guard. God rest his soul, the security guard passed away a few hours later.

I watched the story unfold on Fox News, Studio B with Shepherd Smith. But, my jaw dropped to the floor as the analysis began.

Just recently the Department of Homeland Security issued an erroneous document that highlighted possible extremists. As I’m sure you know, those topping the list as most concerning were: pro-Israel, pro-2nd amendment, Christian, pro-life, and ex-military.

What the left won’t tell you on their mission to isolate the conservatives of our country is that WE, the Right, have the numbers!

71% of Americans view Israel favorably

49% are pro-life, versus 41% pro-”choice”

77% are pro-2nd Amendment

And yet, they want to try to convince the world, via a liberal media, that conservatives are a fringe minority.

Today, Shepherd Smith, and his ex-CIA guest, proceeded to sum up the shooter’s motive by saying he was ex-military. And, according to the DHS, they are considered to be extremists. Shep went on to say, based off of his destructive behavior in the museum, it proves the accuracy of the report. We need to be watching the military.

Let me tell you, this man, James Von Braun, who was in the military OVER 60 YEARS AGO,  was also a college graduate. He attended Midwestern College and played varsity football. Do you realize how liberal, racist, and anti-conservative today’s colleges are? Why is the college education not to blame? Afterall, it seems to be college degrees that are causing so much destruction in today’s society. The liberal indoctrination is astounding, and one almost cannot safely attend college courses anymore if they want to maintain their sanity.

Why not blame football? Afterall, it is an incredibly aggressive sport- and many pro-football players have committed violent crimes- can anyone say OJ?

No, that’s not what the left does. They blame our military, they blame Christians, heck, I’m sure George Bush will get blamed for this as some point.

This is asinine! I emailed the show and Shep actually read my letter on air. He, obviously, disagreed with me and quickly threw me in the conservative discard pile, but I still would like somone to explain to me how this man’s vile behavior can be blamed on the military!

Like I told Shep, our military are heroes. And they fight for your right to sit up on your high horse and speak poorly of them. They fight for the right to burn the flag that drapes their casket. May it be said that I commend our military and our prayers are ever with you.

Shame on you, Shepherd Smith, for perpetuating the concentration camps they are exiling all conservative minds to.

Further, he spoke with much disdain for those of us who STILL believe our president has not proven his natural-born citizenship and those of us who believe him to be a Muslim. Prior to the Cairo speech, I would have said “closet” Muslim, but he made it pretty apparent that he’s out of his closet.

Smith commended Obama on his inspiration and his ability to bring the youth of America together. Um, can anyone else think of another leader who preached “change” that brought youth together? I’m warning you, people, this is the 4th Reich!

This country is unrecognizable! Come on, conservative comrades, stand up and fight!

SocialTwist Tell-a-Friend
 09 Sep 2008 @ 10:44 PM 

Robin Hood Obama, as Bill coined, seemed a little more comfortable tonight. Both parties did for that matter. I am now quasi-convinced that Barak actually believes (somewhat) this economic-utopic illusion someone told him to create. The reason I say “someone told him to create” is because he seems very well informed on what he claims to believe, but very unassured of himself or his ability to sell it. You can tell that he has been advised from other, left-wing, wing nut, no doubt, people that have convinced him that this is what is right for our country.  I think that even though he seemed more comfortable tonight, I don’t believe that it is because he truly understands that which he is trying to sell, more that he’s comfortable with the talking points given to him by campaign staffers that probably have more of the experience that he is so obviously lacking. He gets this deer in a head lamp look when asked a question he hadn’t been coached on. Bill caught him on a few of those in part 2 of this interview.  I think he sincerely just doesn’t know. Proof? How many times did he vote “Present” in senate? 130 times. Sure, most of those were probably political posturing, or sideswiping, so that he wouldn’t ruffle feathers amongst voters or community citizens he was trying to stay “in’ with. For example: “In 1999, Barack Obama was faced with a difficult vote in the Illinois legislature — to support a bill that would let some juveniles be tried as adults, a position that risked drawing fire from African-Americans, or to oppose it, possibly undermining his image as a tough-on-crime moderate.” New York Times. So- he effectively sideswiped it by voting “Present”. But I think in some cases, this ignorant man just doesn’t know. And who can blame him for not understanding it all- afterall, we’re all learning. However, we are not all running for President of the United States. And I don’t think I want this job to be “on-the-job” training for Mr. Obama. Not with my family’s well-being at stake, no thank you. Our economy has shown that the Bush tax cuts have given our government 20% more revenue! Yeah- that’s a “more”. Obama tries to say that is these very tax cuts that have caused our nation to have racked up a 4 trillion dollar debt. Obama could not give a sound reason for the ballooning debt. If he can’t explain the root of it, how can he come up with a way to stop it? First of all, I have to reiterate that he wants to take more of your money to try to control this problem. Truth? A war is quite costly and, as O’reilly stated, spending is out of control. The earmarks and pork-barrel spending have been out of control. This is exactly why a McCain administration would be so valuable for us. He stands strongly against both, putting the money back where it belongs- in our pockets. But, something really interesting, Obama was quoted as saying recently that he would continue the Bush tax cuts if our economy was still bad when he got elected. Hmmm….Bush tax cuts bad, costing us 4 trillion dollars? Bush tax cuts good in a bad economy? Bush tax cuts bad in a good economy? What, Barack? This implies that tax hikes are never good and like I always say, he is quite the flip-flopper. And this proves his inexperience and his inability to have strong convictions on which to stand. By the way guys, all democrats say they are going to cut taxes for the bottom group of people, in Obama’s case, it was 95% of people, and all democrats have proven that to be a lie. The point is- in a community that has raised taxes of any kind, the society shrivels. Obama’s examples and comments proved that he believes in socialism and income redistribution, i.e. the comparison between him and a waitress. If he has more money, why not give more? In O’Reilly’s words- there is no free lunch! Obama again states that in our current economy people are struggling to pay their bills. I’m so tired of him peddaling this crap. Why is it the government’s, yours and my responsibility to bail these people out? Where’s the concept of personal responsibility to not buy things you can’t afford? If someone is really in need, then there are programs for that, but just because someone buys a house they can’t afford or gets one too many credit cards, I do not support our paying for this. Now at this point, the readers of my blog who work, pay their own way, and care to budget their money are getting this, but for those of you who live off of our money, I’m sure I’m going to get an earfull. People that are lazy and don’t want to take care of their own bills will naturally vote for Obama. The tax hikes won’t effect them except to give them more government fluff. You’re welcome! Why would people be so inclined to attain wealth in our capitalist society if they are unable to truly reap the benefits? Putting the government in charge of and administering charity is a very bad plan. He says sewer lines are crumbling- that is not the responsibility of the federal government- it is a responsibility of local taxes and local government, but he can disguise his tax hikes by using seemingly necessary “repairs” and what not. Obama is definitely not a federalist nor a capitalist, rather a socialist who ultimately believes in one-world unity leaving we Americans exposed to the harsh wilderness that is the rest of the world, most of which are 3rd would countries who subscribe to Islam. Even if, as he says, tax hikes were truly reserved for just the wealthy, then we are still in trouble because it is the wealthy who start businesses and the “trickle”, and they will refuse to invest in small business which will murder our economy. See, both socialism and capitalism believe in the trickle effect, however, one, socialism, teaches that we are baffoons and the government should take as much as they can and decide where to place that trickle- most often in the hands of criminals and drug addicts who can’t or won’t work and want the “government”, meaning you and me, to fund them, thus starting the very expensive government trickle. Capitalism teaches, and has taught, successfully, might I add, that an economy where people are encouraged and inspired to earn and spend and invest that the trickle effect of that spending and investing will benefit all. Socialism sounds great at the onslaught, considering that you’re just helping out, but it has maimed every society who has tried it. This is a startling contrast between the liberal left and the conservative right- one believes in utopia and believes the government should control everything, every aspect of our lives, and the other sees reality, that in a free society where people are encouraged through self-responsibility and accountability, society, as a whole, thrives. You will always have the poor amongst you, in Jesus’s words, but it is not the responsibility of the government to mandate that a portion of my hard-earned money goes to them. Worth noting as well is that people would much rather give freely out of their excess than for the government to yank it and force their hand. This way, those that are truly in need, receive, but those that refuse to work and let the government (us) foot the bill- that’s reality and that’s wrong. We do not want a communist government!

So- Bill O’Reilly held his own tonight and did a nice job of calling him out. Unfortunately for Obama, he seems to know what he believes, but is obviously very inexperienced. Round II- O’Reilly!

By the way, guys, worth mentioning. During the interview last week, I was rather annoyed that O’Reilly used this stage as a time to bond with Obama over the fact that he disagreed with our going into Iraq in the first place. Gag.

SocialTwist Tell-a-Friend
Tags Tags: , , , ,
Categories: Uncategorized
Posted By: admin
Last Edit: 09 Sep 2008 @ 10 44 PM

EmailPermalinkComments (0)
\/ More Options ...
Change Theme...
  • Users » 2
  • Posts/Pages » 69
  • Comments » 71
Change Theme...
  • VoidVoid « Default
  • LifeLife
  • EarthEarth
  • WindWind
  • WaterWater
  • FireFire
  • LightLight